Rebalancing: How to get your portfolio back on track

Don’t miss out

Figure 6: Restoring the originally defined asset allocation with rebalancing

Your portfolio is set, your asset allocation is determined – and then the markets do what they want. Prices rise, fall, shift. Suddenly your portfolio no longer matches your risk profile. Does that have to be the case? Not necessarily. In this 5th lesson of our financial guide, you’ll find out how you can rebalance your assets with little effort – and when you can save yourself the trouble.

< Lesson 4 | Overview | Lesson 6 >

Short & sweet

  • Rebalancing means adjusting your portfolio back to your target weighting after market fluctuations – no more and no less.
  • If you hold a single global ETF and a fixed amount of Swiss francs as a low-risk component, you do not need rebalancing.
  • It becomes relevant if the low-risk portion is defined as a percentage or if different asset classes in the portfolio perform differently.
  • Checking once or twice a year is sufficient – readjustment is only worthwhile if there is a deviation of 5 percentage points or more, ideally via new deposits rather than sales.
  • The so-called rebalancing bonus can bring a small additional return, but is a welcome side effect – the real argument remains risk control.

What is rebalancing – and do you even need it?

In the last lesson, you learned how to divide your assets into a high-risk and a low-risk part. The foundation of your portfolio is now in place. But the markets don’t stick to your plan: prices rise and fall, and the weightings shift with them. Rebalancing means restoring the original allocation.

An example: You have invested CHF 100,000 – 75% high-risk, 25% low-risk.

Initial situation: global portfolio with risk split 75/25 and total assets of CHF 100,000; profile: dynamic. (Source: own presentation)

Now the stock markets collapse by 30%. Your risky portion falls from CHF 75,000 to CHF 52,500, while the CHF 25,000 in your savings account remains unchanged. Your total assets now amount to CHF 77,500 – and the low-risk portion is suddenly 32% instead of 25%. Your portfolio is much more conservative than you had planned.

Rebalancing before
Asset allocation after a price slump of 30% in the high-risk portion. The low-risk portion rises from 25% to 32% – the portfolio is more conservative than planned. (Source: own illustration)

To get back to 75/25, you would have to shift around CHF 5,600 from your savings account to the risky part – after a crash, of all times, when your gut feeling is against it. This is exactly what rebalancing is: a sober, rule-based correction that brings your portfolio back into line with your risk profile.

When you don’t need rebalancing

But before you create a rebalancing calendar now: Not every portfolio needs this correction. If you hold a single global ETF and define the low-risk portion as a fixed amount in Swiss francs – e.g. CHF 25,000 in your savings account, excluding your nest egg – you simply have nothing to rebalance. The ETF is adjusted internally by the provider on an ongoing basis. And a fixed amount does not move, no matter what the markets do. In the same crash, your CHF 25,000 stays where it is. Your risky part has become smaller, but your risk profile has not changed. No need for action.

Rebalancing therefore becomes relevant if the low-risk portion is defined as a percentage (as in the example above) or if the portfolio consists of several ETFs, such as in a core-satellite approach. In both cases, the weightings drift apart over time – and you have to actively readjust them. We will now take a look at how this can be done pragmatically and cost-effectively.

Rebalancing in practice: how to bring your portfolio into balance

Two questions arise: When should you rebalance? And how?

When to rebalance?

In theory, there are two approaches: calendar-based and threshold-based. With the calendar-based approach, you review your portfolio at fixed intervals – about once a year. With the threshold-based approach, you only take action if a deviation exceeds a certain value, e.g. 5 percentage points.

In practice, you can combine the two: You check your portfolio once or twice a year – and only intervene if the deviation is large enough. That’s enough. Rebalancing is not a daily business, but an occasional adjustment.

Three ways to bring your portfolio back into balance

There are basically three methods to bring your portfolio back in line with the target weighting:

  • Rebalancing: You sell investments that are above their target weighting and use them to buy underweighted positions. Classic, but associated with transaction costs.
  • Cash flow rebalancing: You direct new deposits – for example from your monthly savings amount – specifically into the underweighted positions. No need to sell, no additional costs. For investors in the savings phase, this is the most elegant approach, which we also follow.  
  • Combination: In the event of minor deviations, readjust by making new deposits. Only in the event of major shifts do you actively reallocate.

Perfection is out of place

If you balance every position exactly to the franc, you will pay unnecessarily high transaction fees – especially for smaller amounts. Concentrate on the biggest deviations. If the overall distribution between the high-risk and low-risk parts is correct again, you can safely ignore minor imbalances within the high-risk part. The next time you make a savings deposit, you can simply adjust them again. As a rule of thumb: If a position deviates from its target weighting by more than 5 percentage points, an intervention is indicated. Below this, the effort is not worthwhile in most cases.

The following graphic shows what this looks like in concrete terms.

Rebalancing after
Asset allocation after rebalancing. The target weighting of 75/25 has been restored – minor deviations within the risky part are deliberately tolerated. (Source: own presentation)

Good to know: Rebalancing in the deconsolidation phase, 3rd pillar and taxes

De-savings phase

What has been described so far relates to the accumulation phase – i.e. the time in which you build up your assets. But you can also rebalance your assets when you retire. The principle is simply reversed: Instead of targeting new deposits, you first sell positions that are above their target weighting. In this way, you bring your portfolio closer to the target weighting with each withdrawal – without additional transactions.

3rd pillar

If you hold part of your assets in the 3rd pillar: Rebalancing is usually automated here. You enter your risk profile once and the provider takes care of the rebalancing for you – often already included in the management fees. You still have to take care of rebalancing your free assets yourself.

Taxes

Rebalancing generally has no tax consequences for private investors in Switzerland. Capital gains on private assets are tax-free. The only exception: anyone who trades so frequently and on such a large scale that the tax authorities suspect commercial securities trading must pay tax on gains as income. This is not an issue for one or two rebalancing transactions per year.

The rebalancing bonus: a welcome side effect

The main aim of rebalancing is clear: to bring your portfolio back in line with your risk profile. However, there is a pleasant side effect that is known in specialist literature as the rebalancing bonus.

The principle behind it is simple: with rebalancing, you systematically buy investments that have fallen and reduce those that have risen. You are therefore acting anti-cyclically – and it is precisely this behavior that can generate a small additional return in the long term. Various studies put this effect at around 0.1 to 0.5 percentage points per year.

The honest flip side

The rebalancing bonus is not a law of nature. It works best when prices return to the mean after spikes – the so-called regression to the mean. In phases with long-lasting trends, however, rebalancing can slow you down because you sell winners too early. None other than Charlie Munger, Warren Buffett’s partner of many years, firmly rejected rebalancing for precisely this reason: systematically cutting winners slows down the growth of your portfolio.

Then there are the transaction costs. If you have to rebalance with an expensive house bank, you will quickly eat up the bonus again. The rebalancing bonus is therefore only worthwhile with a low-cost online broker where the fees per transaction are low.

Therefore: See the bonus as a welcome extra, not as a guarantee.

The real argument for rebalancing is not the additional return – but risk control.

– Partner offers –

Still looking for the right financial solution? Our recommendations – with attractive starting bonuses.

Recommendations EN

– – – – –

Conclusion

Rebalancing is not a third major investment principle alongside diversification and asset allocation – but the maintenance that ensures that your portfolio remains in line with your risk profile even after market fluctuations.

If you keep it simple – a global ETF and a fixed amount of Swiss francs in your savings account – you don’t need to worry about this. For everyone else: check once or twice a year and readjust if there are major deviations, preferably by making new deposits rather than selling. Perfection is out of place – as long as the overall allocation is correct, you can safely ignore minor imbalances.

In lesson 6, we take a closer look at the investment vehicle that crops up again and again in this guide: the ETF. What’s behind it – and why are we talking about a revolution in private investment?

You can find an overview of all the lessons here: Learning to invest – in eight lessons.

This might also interest you

Updates

2026-04-14: Article completely revised and updated.

Disclaimer

Disclaimer: Investing involves risks of loss. You must decide for yourself whether you want to bear these risks or not.

Errors excepted: We have written this article on rebalancing to the best of our knowledge and belief. Our aim is to provide you, as a private investor, with the most objective and meaningful financial information possible. However, if we have made mistakes, forgotten important aspects and/or are no longer up to date, we would be grateful if you could let us know.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *