Lombard loan when buying ETFs: a booster for your return on equity or playing with fire?

Share on social media

This time we are addressing a very controversial topic: leveraging return on equity using equity ETFs on credit. Yes, even more: for many investors, including the blogger community, credit-financed investments are a no-go. Not for us. In this blog post, we report on our experiences with Lombard loans, show you how to avoid the “margin call” horror scenario with confidence and when you should definitely steer clear of securities loans.

Short & sweet

  • Lombard loans are only aimed at investors with strong nerves and a focus on returns.
  • With a Lombard loan, your custodian bank grants you additional liquidity in return for pledging your securities and charging interest.
  • The amount of interest on loans varies greatly depending on the provider. Experience has shown that Interactive Brokers offers particularly attractive conditions.
  • This liquidity is granted to you in the form of a credit line that you can draw on flexibly.
  • If you invest these additional liquid funds in securities, you achieve a leverage effect.
  • This credit leverage has the effect of increasing your return on equity with comparatively little investment when share prices rise. The opposite is true when prices fall.
  • Before you take out a Lombard loan, you should understand the two risks of “margin call” and “rising interest rates” and take effective precautions, such as never fully utilizing the credit line and planning your budget carefully.
  • Finally, you should ask yourself whether you are able to deal with strong price fluctuations. If not, then you should definitely stay away from Lombard loans!

Let’s start with a short, tempting thought experiment: “If global ETFs yield a good 8 percent per year in the long term and lending rates are significantly lower, then investing in leveraged funds is a great deal, a no-brainer.”

What is a Lombard loan?

A Lombard loan is a securities loan. This means that in return for pledging your liquid securities, such as shares (ETFs) or bonds, you receive a credit line from your custodian bank that you can draw on flexibly. The pledged securities remain your property and you continue to benefit from any increases in value and dividend payments.

You pay interest on the loan you take out. This interest rate is often significantly lower than for a personal or consumer loan. This is because the bank receives additional collateral in the form of your pledged securities (similar to real estate financing with a mortgage loan). This considerably reduces the default risk for the lending bank. This means that if you are no longer able to repay the interest and loan, the bank can simply sell your pledged securities. In summary, the Lombard loan has the following features:

  • Pledging of custody account assets
  • The maximum credit amount depends on the pledged securities (as a general rule, the safer the securities to be pledged are assessed by the bank, the higher the credit line granted).
  • Obligation to make additional contributions or forced sale in the event of a shortfall (“margin call”)
  • Can be mutually terminated at any time

What types of Lombard loans are there?

According to our research, current account loans and, less frequently, fixed advance Lombard loans are frequently offered on the Swiss market. In contrast to the fixed advance, the current account variant usually has neither a fixed term, nor a fixed loan amount, nor a fixed interest rate. Instead, with the current account variant, you can usually cancel the loan at any time and use the credit line flexibly according to your actual needs (and only pay interest on it!). Finally, the interest rate is also flexible, i.e. it can vary on a daily basis depending on the market situation. In this article, we will focus on the “current account Lombard loan” variant.

The explanations in the section above are a simplification of the securities lending business. Before taking out a Lombard loan, you should carefully study the individual contractual conditions and the small print of your lending custodian bank.

Why should I take out a Lombard loan at all?

You can pursue various goals with a Lombard loan. In any case, you receive additional liquidity without having to sell your securities. You can use this additional cash for various purposes: for example, for a trip around the world, a new kitchen or for additional investments.

We focus on additional investments (in equity ETFs), because only in this case can youleverage your return on equity. In other words, when you invest with leverage, you are basically always pursuing the same goal: to move large sums of money with a small amount of capital.

From a sober or financial point of view, a Lombard loan is always worthwhile if the price gains, including dividends, are higher than the interest on the loan.

What is a loan-to-value ratio?

The pledged assets are mortgaged at a percentage of the respective market value. This so-called loan-to-value ratio (LTV) varies depending on the risk, tradability of the security and the bank.

Let’s assume you have a global equity ETF portfolio with a market value of CHF 100,000 and want to take out a Lombard loan. Your custodian bank first carries out a risk assessment of your portfolio. Based on this, it determines the loan-to-value ratio, which must not be exceeded, otherwise a margin call is imminent. But more on this later.

The safer your portfolio is valued by the bank, the higher the maximum loan-to-value ratio will be. In this article, including the example below, we assume a maximum LTV of 50%, which is realistic for a broadly diversified equity ETF portfolio.

This means that in addition to your self-financed securities worth CHF 100,000, you will receive a maximum of another CHF 100,000 as borrowed capital. If you draw down the entire credit line and invest it in securities, you have a leverage of two.

The higher the loan-to-value ratio or LTV, the more leverage potential you have. So the LTV formula is:

LTV = Loan / Value = Lombard loan / Deposit value

Deposit value = 200,000 (current market value consisting of equity and loan)

Equity = 100’000

Loan = 100’000

LTV = 100,000 / (200,000) = 0.50 = 50%

Based on an LTV of 50%, the following chart shows the interplay between share price performance and LTV. As a general rule, if the share price or portfolio value increases, the LTV decreases and vice versa.

Thanks to the rising prices at the beginning and for the most part thereafter, the LTV never reached the critical “margin call” danger zone during the entire 14-year period, which in our example would have meant an LTV of over 50%. (As we will show later, we strongly advise against using the entire credit line of LTV 50% right from the start).

Lombard loan Return on equity
Development of the MSCI World Index over 14 years: Because stock market prices rose sharply in the first year of borrowing after the financial crisis, the LTV fell to 41% and remained outside the “margin call” danger zone over the entire period until the end of 2022. (Data source: MSCI World price index in EUR, i.e. excluding dividends).

How does the loan-to-value ratio affect my return on equity?

In short: very direct, both when prices are rising and falling. This leverage is therefore a double-edged sword.

Specifically, using the example above: If your securities portfolio increases by 10% to CHF 220,000 after one year, you will double your return on equity to 20% thanks to the loan leverage (20,000 price gains on securities / 100,000 invested equity). Without the Lombard loan, however, your return on equity would only be 10%.

In the event of price losses, things look correspondingly bleak: With a 10% stock market plunge, your portfolio value drops to CHF 180,000. Your leveraged negative return on equity doubles and thus amounts to -20% (20,000 price losses / 100,000 invested equity) instead of -10% without a Lombard loan.

What interest rates should I expect?

The interest rates for Lombard loans vary greatly from provider to provider. But even among the more attractively priced online brokers, the conditions can differ quite significantly, as the following table shows:

Credit currencyDEGIROInteractive BrokersSwissquote
CHF4.00%* - 5.50%1.772%**3.51%
EUR5.00%* - 6.50%4.383%**6.07%
USD5.25%* - 6.90%5.830%**7.54%
Different margin conditions depending on currency and provider as at 14.1.2025. *Fixed advance, i.e. interest accrues on the entire amount allocated, regardless of how much is actually used. **Up to 90,000 CHF/EUR or 100,000 USD, thereafter gradually more favorable.

The current Lombard loan conditions of the three providers can be found in the following links: DEGIRO | Interactive Brokers | Swissquote

On our new recommendation page you will find the most important features and conditions (including bonus credit) of these three online brokers.

In our experience, Interactive Brokers has also offered extremely attractive conditions for Lombard loans over longer observation periods. Nevertheless, it is worth doing your own research and checking the conditions of your existing custodian bank first. This is because the securities to be pledged must be in the custody account of the lending bank.

What are the risks of a Lombard loan?

Risk and Lombard loans are closely linked, which is why we would like to devote particular attention to this topic. In particular, you should understand and keep an eye on the following three risks:

Risk “Realization of price losses through margin calls”

We see the risk with the greatest financial impact in the forced sale of collateral by the broker. How can this happen? Basically, whenever the deposit value of your margin account (i.e. an account that is partially financed with securities credit) falls below the minimum amount required by the custodian bank (maintenance margin), which means that the LTV exceeds the maximum permissible limit.

Although the term “margin call” is still in common use and has been known to a wider public since the 2011 film of the same name, it has not been used literally for a long time.

Lombard loan Return on equity
The financial thriller “Margin Call” (German: “Der grosse Crash”) became a worldwide box office hit in 2011.

This means that your bank advisor will not pick up the phone as in the past, but will send you a written request to inject additional capital or sell your positions within a certain period of time.

Otherwise, or if you do not comply with the margin call, your bank advisor will close the corresponding positions himself. He therefore sells the securities that have fallen in value at an extremely unfavorable time from the investor’s point of view.

To avoid a margin call, you should consider the following preventive countermeasures:

  • Pledge “good securities” to the bank, e.g. broadly diversified equity ETFs. Reason: The safer the bank considers the pledged securities to be, the more generous the loan-to-value ratio (LTV) will be, which gives you a larger margin of safety (see next point).
  • The bank may not fully utilize the credit line or start with a low LTV (e.g. 20%), which is significantly lower than the LTV granted by the bank. In the case of broadly diversified equity ETFs, the bank usually calculates with a maximum LTV of 50% or more.
  • Do not borrow at all-time highs, but only in bear markets. The ideal time would be at the beginning of a longer recovery phase. But catching such a perfect timing is of course pure luck and can only be determined with certainty in retrospect. (Later, we will explain a rule-based approach to borrowing in detail).
Lombard loan Return on equity
Legend: Even in the event of a massive stock market crash of -60%, you will be spared a margin call if you have previously only used 20% of the credit line, as LTV only rises to 42% and is therefore below the threshold value of 50%. Constellations that lead to a margin call are marked in red. Assumption: The maximum LTV permitted by the bank is 50%. Explanation of credit utilization ratio: If your equity is CHF 100 and you utilize 100% of the credit line, then your credit is also CHF 100. This corresponds to the maximum LTV of 50% permitted by the bank. However, if you only utilize 80% of the credit line, your loan will be CHF 80 (80% of CHF 100). In this case, the deposit value is CHF 180 (100 equity + 80 loan) and the LTV is 44% (= loan / value = 80 / 180).

“Rising interest costs” risk

The interest rates for Lombard loans can change depending on the market situation and currency. The key interest rate, which is determined and regularly reviewed by the Swiss National Bank (SNB), is decisive for the development of Lombard loans in local currency.

The higher the prime rate, the higher the Lombard loan interest rate and the higher the ongoing interest costs. In addition to the prime rate, the margin of the lending bank also influences the interest costs. As we have already seen above, the conditions for Lombard loans vary greatly from provider to provider.  

Lombard loan Return on equity
As a result of increased inflation and in order to achieve the so-called price stability (i.e. an annual increase in consumer prices of between 0 and 2%) targeted by the SNB, the SNB has successively increased the key interest rate since 2022 to 1.75% (as at June 22, 2023) after a negative interest rate phase lasting several years. (Data source: SNB; until 12.6.2019 mean value SNB target range)

Despite these recent interest rate increases, interest rates in Switzerland are currently significantly lower than abroad (USA and eurozone) and have generally been lower in the past. This is reflected in the Lombard interest rates, which vary greatly depending on the currency.

Nevertheless, to avoid the risk of excessive interest costs, you should consider the following countermeasures:

  • Avoid financial distress thanks to careful budget planning using an imputed interest rate of 5% (i.e. budgeting with a safety margin similar to the mortgage business)
  • Taking out a Lombard loan only in the home currency CHF to avoid currency risks and to benefit from a generally lower and more stable interest rate level compared to foreign currencies
  • Setting an interest rate limit for borrowing

“Own nerves of steel” risk

The two risks mentioned above can be managed with a rule-based approach. We are convinced of this. We will go into this in more detail later. However, the situation is completely different when emotions get the better of you and panic spreads after high (book) losses.

In other words, you should honestly answer the following question: How have I reacted to price losses so far? If you have always remained cool and have always (rule-based) replenished your portfolio at low prices, Lombard loans could be an option for you.

If, on the other hand, you suffer from loss aversion, like most investors, we think you should generally steer clear of Lombard loans. An intact quality of life, which includes a good night’s sleep, is definitely a more important value than maximizing profits!

In which market phases is leverage with Lombard loans suitable?

Irrespective of the general stock market situation, the question arises as to whether the interest rate environment described above should decide whether or not to take out a Lombard loan.

While Stefan would only consider taking out a loan if the Lombard loan interest rates were moderate (below 3%), the interest rate level only plays a subordinate role for Toni and hardly influences his decision to take out a loan.

Either way, fortunately Switzerland is traditionally a low-interest country, which is why Lombard loans in local currency are comparatively cheap.

In practice, Lombard loans are often used for short-term speculative investments. Anyone wishing to speculate on profits in the short term therefore leverages in bull markets or stock market bull markets in particular.

The speculator hopes that the price of a promising share will soon go through the roof.

In other words, he uses momentum. In the financial context, momentum describes the tendency for shares with comparatively strong increases in value in the recent past to continue to perform above average in the near future.

An opposing trend is expressed by the term “regression to the mean” from statistics. This is a phenomenon that influences the long-term development of investment returns.

Statistically speaking, the return on shares and other investments always fluctuates around the so-called mean average over a longer period of time. This means that the gross return on your investment will sooner or later return to a long-term market average – regardless of whether the initial returns were positive or negative. However, this mainly applies to medium to long-term periods. For periods of less than 5 years, the regression to the mean does not apply.

Based on this phenomenon, it again seems sensible to leverage in bear markets by means of securities loans. The best time to do this is when the prices of an MSCI World Index, for example, are well below the all-time high.

MSCI World performance by lows

StartEndDuration in daysDrawdownafter 1 year+/- peak*
20.11.198012.08.1982630-28%47%6%
27.08.198726.10.198760-24%25%-5%
04.01.199028.09.1990267-26%21%-10%
20.07.199805.10.199877-21%36%7%
27.03.200009.10.2002926-51%36%-33%
31.10.200709.03.2009495-59%70%-30%
21.05.201511.02.2016266-19%24%0%
26.01.201825.12.2018333-20%31%5%
12.02.202023.03.202040-34%74%15%
The table uses the MSCI World Index to show all stock market crashes (corrections of at least 20%) over the last 40 years as well as the impressive price increases just one year after the stock market dives. *This column shows how high the price is after 1 year of recovery above or below the high since the start of the drawdown. (Source: MSCI World, financial flow, own calculation)

Interim conclusion: We are not interested in short-term speculation. That’s why we believe that if we do take out a Lombard loan, it should only be at stock market prices that are well below the all-time high and – as far as Stefan is concerned – at a moderate interest rate level.

When is the ideal time to amortize Lombard loans?

Mortgage debts are not usually fully amortized in Switzerland. What is the situation with a Lombard loan?

We have developed a strictly rule-based exit strategy based on the key finding for us in connection with Lombard loans that in the past above-average market recoveries have occurred only one year after price dips (see table above). This set of rules includes the following three rules:

  • Rule no. 1:
    The custodian bank should – based on the pledged securities – grant Lombard loans up to a maximum LTV of 50% or higher . (Reason: The higher the maximum LTV granted by the bank, the more safety margin you have in the event of price falls).
  • Rule no. 2:
    Borrowing is staggered, i.e. a maximum of three times at prices 25% (up to LTV 20%), 40% (LTV 30%) and 50% (LTV 40%) below the last all-time high of the MSCI World Index, a comparable index or an ETF based on it.
  • Rule no. 3:
    In turn, the loan amortization always takes place in full when the last all-time high is reached again, i.e. when the share price recovers by 33%, 67% and 100%.

These three rules ensure that even in the event of an extreme stock market crash of 60%, there is no threat of forced selling at the worst possible time as a result of a margin call.

In the following table, we have run through four exit scenarios S1 – S4 with the respective amortization times.

The table should be read as follows: If a price correction of 25% (up to <40%) follows, this is scenario 1 (S1). If there is a price correction of 40% (up to <50%), this is scenario 2 (S2). Scenario 2 includes all the white lines above it, i.e. also the first three of S1. It continues in the same way with extreme scenarios 3 and 4, which address massive price losses of 50% and 60% respectively and will therefore occur very rarely. Each scenario is highlighted in green and consists of two events (separate rows): Price recovery to peak and Credit amortization.

We have again assumed that the custodian bank will grant Lombard loans up to a maximum LTV of 50%. If this threshold is exceeded, there is a risk of a forced sale or a margin call.

Lombard loan Return on equity
In scenario 1 (S1), in the event of a price correction (drawdown) of -25%, an initial loan is taken out up to an LTV of 20%. When the high is reached again, the loan is amortized. Thanks to the credit leverage, this results in a price gain of CHF 6,250. However, if prices continue to fall, a second loan up to LTV 30% is taken out if the price corrects by -40%. In scenario 4 (S4), the maximum price correction is 60%. Even in this extreme scenario, there is (just) no margin call, as the LTV does not exceed 50%. If the old highs are reached again, this results in a leverage-based additional profit of CHF 14,286 (excluding borrowing costs). Previously, three loans were taken out in stages up to an LTV of 40%.

If you want to have more safety margin in the event of a price correction of -60% or want to push the LTV below 50%, you do not take out the third loan in the event of a price correction of -50%. This simple measure would result in an LTV of 45% after a stock market crash of 60% (instead of 50% according to the table).

What does this mean for your return? Below we have compared the return on equity of scenario 1 (S1) with that without credit leverage. It should be noted that we have used the same equity in both calculations, namely the equity at the time of borrowing. We have also assumed 3% borrowing costs and a loan term of 1 year.

Calculation of return on equity WITHOUT credit leverage

Equity used = CHF 75,000 (deposit value at the same time as the loan was taken out)

Exchange rate gain = CHF 25,000 (CHF 100,000 – CHF 75,000)

Return on equity = 33.3% (CHF 25,000 / CHF 75,000 = profit / equity employed)

Calculation of return on equity WITH credit leverage

Equity used = CHF 75,000 (value of equity at the time of borrowing)

Price gain = CHF 31,250 (CHF 125,000 – CHF 93,750)

Credit costs p.a. = 563 CHF (=18,750 CHF * 3%)

Profit after borrowing costs = 30,687 (= 31,250 CHF – 563 CHF)

Return on equity = 40.9% (= 30,687 / 75,000 = profit / equity employed)

What are the advantages and disadvantages of Lombard loans?

As mentioned, you can use the additional liquidity you receive from the Lombard loan for various purposes. For example, if you “consume” the loan, the main advantage is that you don’t have to sell your securities to obtain the necessary liquidity. You also generally benefit from lower interest rates than with a personal loan.

However, at this point we are only interested in Lombard loans that are invested in additional securities. The advantages and disadvantages listed correspond to our subjective opinion and are to be understood in comparison to a classic, non-leveraged investment.

Advantages and disadvantages of Lombard loans

Higher potential returns through leverage
Asset accumulation possible with lower investment
Tax optimization through deduction of loan interest
Risk of financial losses due to forced sale (margin call) or rising credit costs
A challenge for your own nerves due to more violent, lever-induced fluctuations
More expensive due to credit costs and more frequent trading of securities (transaction fees)
Additional time expenditure due to periodic portfolio checks and market observations
Limited use of the pledged securities, as these represent collateral for the bank (e.g. no sale with subsequent consumption possible)

What leverage alternatives are there to the Lombard loan?

Below we present two other ways in which you can invest with leverage.

Alternative 1: Leverage through leveraged ETFs

With this variant, you invest in special leveraged ETFs which, like traditional ETFs, track an index, but whose price performance is amplified by a certain factor. For example, if a factor of two is applied and the benchmark index rises by 2% in one day, the leveraged ETF will rise by 4%. In contrast to a lombard loan, you do not receive any additional liquidity with a leveraged ETF and the offer is still quite modest. Nevertheless, we find the concept behind leveraged ETFs exciting, which is why we will devote a separate article to this investment opportunity.

Alternative 2: Leverage through structured products

Structured products with leverage are complex financial products that can be used to react to a price movement in the underlying asset. Popular underlying assets are individual shares, indices, commodities and currencies. We reject structured products with leverage because, in our opinion, they are too expensive and not transparent enough. The latter is particularly evident in their often opaque construction.

Conclusion

It’s obvious: taking out a securities loan is only suitable for investors with strong nerves and should be carefully considered. This is because the leverage associated with borrowing works on both sides: Price gains and losses are amplified. In addition, interest rates on loans can rise in the short term, which can put additional strain on your nerves.

Furthermore, you should only consider a Lombard loan if you have already invested existing cash or other, more favorable equity.

If you are aware of these points, you should now arm yourself against the risks associated with a Lombard loan.

And this brings us back to our introductory thought experiment. Unfortunately, investing with debt financing is not a no-brainer, even if the returns on the stock market are likely to be higher than the interest on Lombard loans in the long term – especially in our home currency, the CHF.

Unlike with self-financed ETFs, with debt-financed securities you cannot simply sit out heavy price losses in the tried-and-tested buy and hold manner. The reason for this is the margin call and the associated risk, which means you have to sell your securities at the worst possible time.

To avoid the financial losses associated with the margin call, you should never fully utilize the credit line granted by the bank. This will provide you with an important safety margin – and peace of mind.

You should also make sure that your interest costs don’t get out of hand. Specifically, this second safety measure could consist of carefully calculating the expected interest costs (i.e. with a safety margin or a high, imputed interest rate of 5%) based on serious budget planning. Another measure against high interest costs could be to set yourself an interest rate limit when taking out the loan.

Conclusion: Leveraged equity ETFs boost your return on equity when prices rise. Lombard loans become a gamble with fire for you if you have not taken any rule-based safety precautions – and therefore fall into a margin call.

This might also interest you

Updates

2025-01-14: Margin rates for Lombard loans from DEGIRO, Interactive Brokers and Swissquote updated.

2024-07-02: Margin rates for Lombard loans from DEGIRO, Interactive Brokers and Swissquote updated.

Disclaimer

Transparency note: Unlike Stefan, at the time of publication of this article Toni had leveraged his portfolio with a Lombard loan from Interactive Brokers. Previously, both had gained initial experience with Lombard loans from DEGIRO.

Disclaimer: Investing involves risks. You must decide for yourself whether or not you want to take these risks.

Errors excepted: We have written this article to the best of our knowledge and belief. Our aim is to provide you as a private investor with the most objective and meaningful financial information possible. However, should we have made any errors, forgotten important aspects and/or no longer have up-to-date information, we would be grateful if you could let us know.

7 Kommentare

  1. M.J.K. says:

    Ein Risiko solltet ihr vielleicht noch erwähnen: Die Maintenance Margin ist keine fixe Grösse. Die Bank / der Broker kann sie bei einem bestehenden Kredit je nach Risikobeurteilung jederzeit anpassen. Auch die Beleihungsfaktoren für die einzelnen Wertpapiere, die die Bank zur Berechnung der LTV Ratio verwendet, können angepasst werden. Insofern kann es unter ungünstigen Umständen auch bei strikter Einhaltung der selbst definierten Regeln zum Margin Call kommen.

  2. NaTakk says:

    Was aus meiner Sicht fehlt, ist das Risiko von der Steuerbehörden als professioneller Trader behandelt zu werden. Eines der Kriterin dazu ist nähmlich, dass man auf Kredit kauft.
    Oder habe ich dies überlesen?
    Sonst finde ich den Artikel sehr interessant uns ausgewogen.

    1. Schweizer Finanzblog says:

      wir und aktuell insbesondere Toni, welcher sein Portfolio substanziell mit Lombardkrediten hebelt, können nicht bestätigen, dass eine solche steuerliche Neubehandlung stattfindet.

      1. NaTakk says:

        Dann lest doch bitte mal dies hier:

        https://www.estv.admin.ch/dam/estv/de/dokumente/dbst/kreisschreiben/2004/1-036-D-2012.pdf.download.pdf/1-036-D-2012-d.pdf

        Ist aber eine Fremdfinanzierung vorhanden, trägt die steuerpflichtige Person ein erhöhtes Risiko, welches ein Indiz für eine selbständige Erwerbstätigkeit darstellt. Sofern die Schuldzinsen und Spesen nicht durch periodische Einkünfte gedeckt werden können, sondern mittels Veräusserungsgewinnen beglichen werden müssen, kann von einer privaten Vermögensverwaltung nicht mehr die Rede sein (ASA 69, 788).

        Ich sage nicht, dass es so sein muss, aber es gibt 5 Kriterien und jeder von diesen muss erfüllt sein, damit wir als private Investoren angesehen werden. Somit besteht beim Lobardkredit das Risiko diesen Status zu verlieren.

        1. Schweizer Finanzblog says:

          Danke für das Einbringen der 5 Kriterien in Ziff. 3 aus dem verlinkten ESTV-Kreisschreiben, welches eine gute Diskussionsbasis darstellt. Eine Korrektur gleich zu Beginn: Du schreibst, alle 5 Kriterien müssen erfüllt sein, damit wir als private Investoren angesehen werden. Diese Formulierung ist offensichtlich nicht korrekt. Denn im besagten Schreiben heisst es in Ziff. 3, letzter Absatz: “Sind diese Kriterien nicht kumulativ erfüllt, kann gewerbsmässiger Wertschriftenhandel nicht ausgeschlossen werden. Die entsprechende Beurteilung erfolgt hierbei auf Grund sämtlicher Umstände des konkreten Einzelfalls.

          Auf der gleichen Seite ist Fussnote 3, in welcher Alt-Bundesrat Villiger zitiert wird, für uns Anleger interessant, weil hier eine sehr zurückhaltende Auslegung angedeutet wird: “…Es sind im
          allgemeinen seltene Fälle, und dabei wird es bleiben. Das ist auch im Interesse des Fiskus, denn der Fiskus trägt bei der gewerbsmässigen Besteuerung auch ein Risiko, weil er dann nämlich auch
          Verluste zum Abzug zulassen muss; …”

          Zudem erwähnst du (zurecht) Kriterium 4, denn dieses spricht die Fremdfinanzierung direkt an. Im Wortlaut gemäss erwähntem Kreisschreiben: “Die Anlagen sind nicht fremdfinanziert oder die steuerbaren Vermögenserträge aus den Wertschriften (wie z.B. Zinsen, Dividenden, usw.) sind grösser als die anteiligen Schuldzinsen.” Hier scheint uns wichtig, dass es sich um eine oder-Formulierung handelt und der zweite Teil dieses Kriteriums für viele Anleger mit fremdfinanzierten Wertschriften wohl problemlos erfüllt sein dürfte.

          Unser Fazit: In den meisten Fällen werden die Steuerbehörden wohl auf eine Statusänderung (vom Privatanleger zum Wertschriftenhändler) verzichten, und zwar auch im Fall, wenn nicht alle 5 Kriterien erfüllt werden. Wer diesbezüglich kein Risiko eingehen will, macht ein Steuerruling, d.h. er oder sie beantragt vor der Aufnahme des Lombardkredits bei der kantonalen Steuerbehörde einen Steuervorbescheid. (Disclaimer: Dies ist lediglich unsere Meinung/Interpretation und keine Steuerberatung.)

  3. Daniel Party says:

    Guten Tag
    Ich finde die Vorstellung des Lombardkredites in einem seriösen Finanzblog etwas heikel. Die NY-Börse steht bald auf einem Allzeit-Hoch, trotz anstehender Rezession.
    Wenn schon spekulieren, dann mit Geld, das nicht für den Lebensunterhalt gebraucht wird. Deshalb ist ein Exposure über Mini-Futures, auch wenn „intransparent“, besser als ein Lombardkredit. Mini-Futures gibt es auch auf auf single stocks wie auch auf Indices und die Verlustmöglichkeit ist klar begrenzt.
    Wenn ein Lombardkredit, dann nur um Zinsarbitrage zu machen. Ich zahle Lombardzinsen, erhalte aber im Gegenzug einen höheren Dividenden- oder Couponsbetrag. Beispielsweise wären aktuell die Schweizer Versicherungstitel attrakive Kandidaten. Sie werfen alle zwischen 5-6% Dividendenrendite ab.
    Lombardkreditzinsen sind im übrigen, normalerweise nicht von den Steuern abzugsfähig.

    1. Schweizer Finanzblog says:

      Guten Tag

      Danke für deinen Beitrag, auch wenn wir deine Meinung nicht teilen. Wir finden nämlich, dass das Thema Lombardkredite sehr wohl in einen seriösen Finanzblog passt, insbesondere dann, wenn es so vertieft und differenziert behandelt wird wie in unserem Beitrag. (Genauso wie das Hypothekenthema in einen seriösen Immobilienblog passt:-). Deutlich skeptischer sind wir hingegen gegenüber den von dir erwähnten intransparenten und teuren strukturierten Produkten.

      Es scheint, als hättest du unseren Artikel nur überflogen. Schade. Denn wir haben den mit dem Lombardkredit verbundenen Risiken sehr viel Raum gewidmet. Auch dein Warnhinweis bezüglich des mutmasslich bald erreichten Allzeithochs passt nicht zu unserer Aussage, dass für uns Lombardkredite nur in Bärenmärkten und nach klaren Regeln in Frage kämen (Konkret: -25% von Allzeithoch und max. 20% LTV).

      Beste Grüsse
      SFB

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *